[GPC] Your project - OWASP Report Generator - has been identified as INACTIVE - Action is required!

[Mark Roxberry]

I'll work on a road map and start the move to 2.0 in the next week.
Regards,

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Paulo Coimbra <paulo.coimbra at owasp.org>wrote:

>  Mark,
>
>
>
> The GPC has recently discussed your proposal to assume the leadership of
> the OWASP Report Generator’s and it’s my pleasure to inform you about its
> decision to thank and endorse your offer. From now on we consider you
> project leader!
>
>
>
> I apologize for the time we have taken to decide – I suppose you were just
> the victim of the time we needed to set a frame to deal systematically with
> orphaned projects.
>
>
>
> I have also been told by Dinis about its intention to contact you directly
> to share a couple of ideas regarding the project’s future direction.
>
>
>
> As I have said you before, we are currently designing the new Project
> Identification’s frame and as soon as it is finished I will get back to you
> to set it up in the project’s wiki page. Meanwhile, if I may, I suggest
> creating a robust and clear roadmap as a way to begin your leadership. It
> goes without saying we recommend you push as much as you can the project up
> the ladder that has been established by the assessment criteria 2.0 and
> please let us know if you think we can be of any help.
>
>
>
> Many thanks, best regards,
>
>
>
> Paulo Coimbra,
>
> OWASP Project Manager <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark Roxberry [mailto:mark.roxberry at owasp.org]
> *Sent:* quinta-feira, 21 de Maio de 2009 20:37
> *To:* Brad Causey
> *Cc:* paulo.coimbra at owasp.org; medelibero at gmail.com;
> global-projects-committee at lists.owasp.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [GPC] Your project - OWASP Report Generator - has been
> identified as INACTIVE - Action is required!
>
>
>
> Brad, I agree with you on the visibility end.  It is a bridge between those
> of us glued to our monitors (like me) and those who use the reports (on
> paper or in a mobile form).  In some ways, making our case to
> managers/stakeholders easier.  I'd like to take a look at it as that kind of
> tool - though not sure what that means quite yet.  Anyone have a top 5 list
> of commercial report generators for baseline ideas?  If it's o.k. with
> everyone, I'll think about design changes and put a proposal out for review
> on the tools mailing list.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Brad Causey <bradcausey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Fine by me.
>
> Mark,
> I'm actually really excited to see where this will go. It seems reporting
> is neglected in many aspects of security, but it touts providing the best
> visibility!
> Thanks!
>
> -Brad
>
>
>
>
>  On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Paulo Coimbra <paulo.coimbra at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Mark,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your answer and for volunteering to assume the OWASP Report
> Generator leadership. Given your past contributions, I couldn’t think of a
> best scenario. Nevertheless, the decision belongs to the Global Projects
> Committee as a whole and so I am copying carbon them. I am sure your due
> answer won’t take long.
>
>
>
> Many thanks, regards,
>
>
>
> Paulo Coimbra,
>
> OWASP Project Manager <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark Roxberry [mailto:mark.roxberry at owasp.org]
> *Sent:* terça-feira, 19 de Maio de 2009 16:51
> *To:* paulo.coimbra at owasp.org
> *Cc:* dinis.cruz at owasp.org; medelibero at gmail.com
> *Subject:* Re: [GPC] Your project - OWASP Report Generator - has been
> identified as INACTIVE - Action is required!
>
>
>
> Does this project need an owner?  I thought I had someone interested a few
> months ago, but they never surfaced (and I was hoping to help out with it).
>  I would like to contribute to it and if it is still orphaned, I'll adopt
> it.  I think it could have both enterprise value and marketing value.  I'm
> on the google code site, is there anything regarding specs or roadmaps out
> there?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Paulo Coimbra <paulo.coimbra at owasp.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Dinis Cruz / Mike de Libero,
>
>
>
> Hope you are well.
>
>
>
> As you may know, the OWASP Global Projects Committee is undertaking the
> task of improving the OWASP Project structure -
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC_Project_Surveys_2009 - which includes
> identifying orphaned projects.
>
>
>
> In this context, the project owner(s) for each OWASP Project have been
> asked several times to complete a self update on the status of their project
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pJzNU1yNJd7VBH1bS6rY0EQ&hl=en and,
> as far as I can see, you haven’t answered yet.
>
>
>
> Thus, please clarify:
>
>
>
> 1. Are you currently leading the*
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ORG_(Owasp_Report_Generator)<https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ORG_%28Owasp_Report_Generator%29>
> *? If not, can you provide the name of the new lead?
>
>
>
> 2. Do you or the new lead require assistance either with the technical
> aspects of your project, or with leading it?
>
>
>
> Please note that the Global Projects Committee will determine very shortly
> whether a project should be archived and retired or put up for adoption.
>
>
>
> I thank you in advance.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Paulo Coimbra,
>
> OWASP Project Manager <https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page>
>
>
>
> Block your agendas for May 11-14 and join us - *OWASP AppSec Europe 2009<http://www.owasp.org/index.php/AppSecEU09>
> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Global-projects-committee mailing list
> Global-projects-committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global-projects-committee
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Global-projects-committee mailing list
> Global-projects-committee at lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global-projects-committee
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/private/global-projects-committee/attachments/20090618/6ca2cc36/attachment-0001.html